Mike Tyson’s former trainer, Teddy Atlas, is again in the spotlight. Why? Let it be known that it is for the same reason as before, digging into Tyson’s notorious ear-biting incident.
Considering the time that has passed, it’s natural to question the importance of more revelations. Is there any relevance at all? One must admit the promise of exposed secrets does make for a tantalizing read. The headline invokes intrigue as it suggests new information will be disseminated. However, the readers will see that the headline is perhaps more intriguing than the reveal itself.
Many were excited when it was announced that Tyson and Evander Holyfield would finally face off after years of delays and disappointments. The wait undoubtedly intensified the anticipation. With two titans meeting, the stakes were high, especially for those who had staked a wage. Regardless of the predictions, the fight did not unfold as expected. Holyfield walked away with the victory. ESPN reports that the fight ended in the 11th round, making Holyfield the first heavyweight champion since Muhammad Ali to win the title three times.
Destiny would bring them together once more. It was a collision of fated ambitions. Both contenders had devoted their lives to securing the title of champion. So it went down in the summer of 1997. It was the “Sound of Fury.” The New York Times notes,
The vanquished champion vowed a knockout. The newly crowned champion vowed to perform better. And the promoter was on a hyperbole high, citing Shakespeare, Faulkner, Einstein, the Kennedys, Snoop Doggy Dogg, and God in meandering soliloquies designed to push the Mike Tyson-Evander Holyfield rematch on May 3 in Las Vegas, Nevada, the greatest athletic endeavor since, presumably, the first Velociraptorr race.
Holyfield beat Iron Mike once, but could he do it again? Fans remained anxious about the likely result. Would it surprise modern audiences that Tyson was favored to win? From a practical standpoint, if a person loses to the defending champion once, the balance typically shifts to favor the defending champion in a rematch. But not this time around. Tyson’s track record was nearly spotless, which meant his chances of victory were still relatively high. Going into the match, Tyson held an impressive record of 34-1 (2 NC) in fights lasting three rounds or fewer throughout his career, totaling 56 fights per ESPN.
Mike Tyson’s overwhelming support and unwavering determination to prove himself seemed futile. The obstacles he encountered proved insurmountable. It was not long before the fight took a tumultuous turn. Sources reveal that Tyson became increasingly agitated during the match. The primary reason for the increased fury was unaddressed actions at the hands of the opponent. Holyfield repeatedly head-butted him. Tyson reportedly informed officials about this, but they took no action. In the third round, Tyson purposely walked out without his mouthguard. The outcome, as commonly expressed, is now part of history.
Holyfield head-butted Tyson during the infamous boxing match. The debate surrounding whether Holyfield’s headbutt was intentional or accidental continues to create discussions among fans and analysts. Holyfield denied malicious intent. Considering the intense rivalry between Tyson and Holyfield and the mounting tensions during the match, it becomes clearer why the events unfolded as they did. When someone close makes an assertion that they have more profound insight, others are eager to listen.
Tyson’s previous coach explained the shocking incident. His assertion seems simple. The whole thing can be summarized in one word: intimidation. According to Atlas, Tyson felt intimidated, and he responded by biting. As noted on his podcast a few years ago, Atlas stated,
“We made a case that Mike could be intimidated. He would show it in different ways. He was intimidated by the manliness of Holyfield by biting his ear off. That’s why he bit his ear off. He was too much man for him. He was intimidated.”
While the revelation was informative, it lacked substance. It added nothing to the public sphere of knowledge. Why the renewed focus? Mike Tyson’s actions in the Jake Paul bout are of particular interest. He exhibited bizarre behavior. The seemingly beleaguered boxer could be seen biting his gloves in multiple instances. This sparked various theories and speculations.
Was Mike Tyson intimidated by Jake Paul this go-around?? Did the biting result from Iron Mike’s attempts to avoid another ear-biting incident? Did biting his glove serve as a way of throwing the fight? Or could it merely be a recurring habit?
After initially attributing Tyson’s early ear-biting incident to intimidation, Atlas offers a contrasting viewpoint on Tyson’s recent behavior. As reported by Express US, Atlas has suggested that this is nothing out of the norm for “Iron Mike.” To make it more sensational, they magnified it and attempted to connect it to the earlier incident. It is cited,
When people asked Tyson about the biting, he knew what to say. Again, keep that image, keep that myth. It’s important in these kinds of realms that they believe that he’s still the bogeyman.”
With this hypothesis, it becomes clearer that there is no direct connection between the two incidents. One incident was driven by frustration, while the other was a habit made to look like something bigger. To paraphrase, “Beware, he is still that guy, the ear-biter.”
Looking back at “Kid Dynamite’s” showdown with Evander Holyfield and the surrounding dynamics, the rationale aligns. He sustained some low blows in the ring, resulting in an injury. This behavior went unchecked; it even seemed as if it was allowed. What does one do when grievances are unheard of? In Mike’s case, it was an ear for a cut above the eye.
“A later interview with Holyfield went like this:
“So in round six, Tyson gets cut from a head-butt. The referee claims it was accidental, but Tyson always insisted that you (Holyfield) purposely head-butted him. What is your take on that?”
Holyfield had more to add. The underlying point remains that he never denied the head-butting. It happened.
Fans eagerly anticipating exciting news will be disappointed as there is none. Mike Tyson’s earlier ear-biting episode was a manifestation of unaddressed frustration and sudden aggression. This is not unique to him. This is something seen in others before. Tyson is not the only one who has resorted to such behavior. It might be exaggerated to claim that Holyfield intimidated him. Tyson explicitly stated in an interview, ‘This is what happened,’ providing a straightforward account of the events.
So why not believe him?
The coach has spoken, and we have another interesting tidbit to add to our pot of speculation. It doesn’t change who he was or who he is now. It won’t affect his future. In news reporting, some days are slower than others, but each piece of information contributes to the broader tapestry of events and stories. Headlines serve various purposes, including simply passing on information like this.
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to our newsletter here. Check out Stadium Rant Original shows on our Youtube channel and subscribe! Give our socials Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok a follow for more great content!
